Our ideal of “thinking by doing” has a simple logic. It is that architecture transverses between “knowing” and “doing.” This is distinct, for example, from mathematics. The purity of mathematics is that if you know two plus two is four, then you have done two plus two to four. This is not the case for us. The purity of geometry underlying architecture is entirely one aspect, making it, with real material and structure is an entirely different one. “Thinking by Doing” also has other implication. We believe that architecture is best learnt by doing, by making things. In this sense doing precedes knowing. That language and “conceptual” is not as honest as learning by doing. But we also go one step further. There is a romanticism here that is not unlike that instituted by Frank Lloyd Wright at Taliesin. Here one thinks in manner that is architecture by doing things. This year we have conducted multiple workshops with different materials and objectives, such as Bamboo, ferro-cement and in multiple places as diverse as Auroville and Prague. The aim remains the same, in making things, one learns through hands, and it is a lesson, which is pure and stays. Hands, which when draw, remember and rethink. Doing, thinking, and rethinking…this is the way to a unique creativity.